Canadian doctors are urging the Stephen Harper government to designate asbestos a hazardous material and stop exporting the carcinogenic material to Asia.
China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, among others, are major importers of Canadian asbestos, which cannot be used in Canada.
Delegates to the general council of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA), meeting in St. John’s last week slammed the Harper government for blocking the inclusion of chrysolite asbestos in the Rotterdam Convention’s Hazardous Substances List.
This would have required exporters to warn importers of the potential health hazards, likely reducing the amount sold worldwide.
“Canada should not be in the business of exporting such a dangerous product,” said Dr. Jeffrey Turnbull, president of the CMA.
The doctors contend that it is hypocritical to export asbestos when it’s not used domestically.
“Canada’s physicians must . . . express outright opposition to the government’s stance,” said Barry Turchen, M.D., during his speech at the annual CMA gathering. “I think this sends a strong message to the federal government that its unethical and shameful behavior (toward the exportation) will not be tolerated by the physicians of Canada.”
“The time for the CMA is now to go beyond calling on the federal government and begging it to take action, as it clearly has no intention of doing so,” Turchen said.
Canada’s Industry Minister Christian Paradis countered that “Canada has promoted the safe and secure use of chrysotile asbestos for 30 years both nationwide and internationally.”
He pointed to scientific reviews that found it can be used under controlled conditions.
The Post group of newspapers, one year ago published an investigation conducted by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) that found that the asbestos industry had ignored waves of asbestos-related disease that have led to bans or restrictions in 52 countries, and continues to ply the mineral in developing nations.
Most of the asbestos sold in those countries is used in cement for corrugated roofing, in water pipes and for home construction.
According to the Asian Ban Asbestos Network, the ratio of asbestos exported to Asia has increased from 70 percent to 86 percent of the global output over the past 10 years.
“The really unfortunate part is that, though they know it’s dangerous, they still live with it because it’s cheap and abundant,” said Murali Krishnan, an Indian reporter who worked on the nine-month investigation.
The asbestos industry has continued to grow, thanks to a “marketing campaign involving a global network of industry groups led by the Canadian government-backed Chrysotile Institute,” said David Kaplan, director of the ICIJ.
Chrysotile is another name for the most common type of asbestos, white asbestos.
Canada, which has asbestos mines but uses almost no asbestos within its borders, became a leader in the global pro-asbestos movement in the 1960s when studies that tied the mineral to cancer threatened to shutter mines in Quebec.
The Montreal-based Chrysotile Institute promotes the “controlled” use of asbestos in construction and manufacturing, a concept the report said is “elusive in developing countries,” where worker safety regulations are lax and more and more people are being exposed to asbestos.
The industry campaign is likely to result in epidemics of asbestos-related diseases within the next decade, with the biggest users, China and India, the hardest hit by the mineral’s devastating health effects, said Kaplan.
Researchers in India have estimated that deaths from asbestos-related cancers could reach one million in developing nations by 2020, while an Australian researcher has predicted five to 10 million deaths from cancers caused by asbestos exposure by 2030.
Finnish researchers estimated that 10,000 to 15,000 people will die in China each year by 2035 of asbestos-related ailments.
Currently, the death toll from asbestos-related diseases is estimated by the International Labor Organization to be 100,000 worldwide.
Perhaps nowhere is the industry as strong as in Gujarat, India. There are more than 400 asbestos cement factories concentrated in the state capital of Ahmedabad, many of which source their supplies from Canada.
At one company alone in Ahmedabad — Gujarat Composite Ltd. — at least 75 workers have been diagnosed with lung cancer in the past 10 years, out of a work force of about 1,000, according to nongovernmental activists in Ahmedabad who are working on asbestos-related diseases. At least 20 of those have died, they said.
“The asbestos market — despite being a health hazard — has grown because it serves the market for the poor,” said Gopal Krishna of the Ban Asbestos Network of India. “And that market is growing at a tremendous pace. So nobody has the time for complaints.”
In India, asbestos products carry no health warning labels and trade unions have no mandate to prevent asbestos-related disease at workplaces. Although researchers around the world have linked lung cancer and other diseases with exposure to the widely used white, or chrysotile, asbestos, the powerful Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association — funded by 12 asbestos companies, as well as by the Canada-based Chrysotile Institute — concedes nothing.
The Chrysotile Institute contends that lung cancer deaths have been caused by inhaling asbestos fiber has not been conclusively proved in India.
It states chrysotile asbestos is less toxic than blue or brown forms of the mineral, which no longer are used.
“Canada’s own tragedy of disease arising from asbestos use is now being repeated in parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America, where workplace safety practices are lax or non-existent,” said Peter Goodhand, President and CEO of the Canadian Cancer Society.
Goodhand adds that worldwide about 90,000 people die annually from disease related to occupational exposure to asbestos, and the asbestos imported from Quebec mines is a major contributor to this death toll.